Leadership skill and emotional Intelligence_Isnin 7.6_11.09 am

How is emotional intelligence related
to the specific behaviors we associate
with leadership effectiveness?
Findings: Higher levels of emotional
intelligence are associated with better
performance in the following areas:
􀂉 Participative Management
􀂉 Putting People at Ease
􀂉 Self-Awareness
􀂉 Balance Between Personal Life and Work
􀂉 Straightforwardness and Composure
􀂉 Building and Mending Relationships
􀂉 Doing Whatever it Takes
􀂉 Decisiveness
􀂉 Confronting Problem Employees
􀂉 Change Management
Participative Management reflects the
importance of getting buy-in at the beginning of
an initiative. It is an extremely important
relationship-building skill in today’s management
climate in which organizations value
interdependency within and between groups. Of
all the skills and perspectives measures on
Benchmarks, participative management had the
largest number of meaningful correlations with
measures of emotional intelligence. In other
words, managers who are seen as good at
listening to others and gaining their input before
implementing change are likely to be assessed as
good at cooperating with others, able to find
pleasure in life, able to foster relationships,
control impulses, and understand their own
emotions and the emotions of others.
Putting People at Ease gets at the heart of
making others relaxed and comfortable in your
presence. From the perspective of direct reports,
putting people at ease was related to impulse
control, which is defined as the ability to resist or
delay the impulse to act. This finding suggests
that being able to behaviorally put people at ease
has to do with controlling your own impulses
with regard to anger or other emotions. Boss
ratings of putting people at ease are related to
happiness, suggesting that your disposition is
related to how comfortable others are in your
presence.
Self-Awareness describes those managers who
have an accurate understanding of their strengths

related to impulse control and stress tolerance. If
you find that you explode into anger easily, it is
likely that others don’t see you as very self-aware.
In addition, it appears that others may draw
conclusions about your self-awareness from how
you handle difficult and challenging situations. If
you get anxious, others may interpret this as a
lack of self-awareness.
Balance Between Personal Life and Work
measures the degree to which work and personal
life activities are prioritized so that neither is
neglected. High ratings from bosses on these
behaviors were associated with the emotional
intelligence measures of social responsibility,
impulse control, and empathy. Giving your
bosses the impression that you are balanced is
connected with your feelings of being able to
contribute to a group, controlling your impulses,
and understanding the emotions of others. High
ratings from direct reports are also associated
with impulse control.
Straightforwardness and Composure, which
refers to the skill of remaining calm in a crisis and
recovering from mistakes, is related to several
emotional intelligence measures. Not
surprisingly, ratings from bosses, peers, and direct
reports on this scale are related to impulse
control. Direct report ratings are also associated
with stress tolerance, optimism, and social
responsibility. Boss ratings are related to
happiness. Thus it appears that being rated highly
on straightforwardness and composure has to do
with controlling impulses during difficult times,
being responsible toward others, and having a
satisfied disposition.
Building and Mending Relationships is the
ability to develop and maintain working
relationships with various internal and external
parties. Ratings from bosses on this scale were
related to only one measure of emotional
intelligence: impulse control. This is not
surprising because poor impulse control manifests
itself as an inability to control hostility and
explosive behavior. Obviously, this tendency will
not translate into strong relationships with bosses.
Similarly, scores on stress tolerance are related to
direct report ratings. Difficulties handling stress
may reveal themselves to direct reports as

problematic relationships or the stress may result
from troubled relationships with direct reports.
Boss ratings on Doing Whatever It Takes,
which has to do with persevering in the face of
obstacles as well as taking charge and standing
alone when necessary were related to two of the
emotional intelligence scales: independence and
assertiveness. People who are high on
independence tend to be self-reliant and
autonomous. Although they may ask for input
from others, they are not dependent on it.
Assertiveness has to do with expressing feelings,
thoughts, and beliefs in a nondestructive manner.
People high on this scale are not shy about letting
others know what they want. Direct report ratings
are associated with independence and optimism.
Optimism has to do with looking at the brighter
side of life. This constellation of relationships
suggests that doing whatever it takes requires
emotional intelligence in the sense of being able
to go after what you want, being able to persevere
in getting what you want, and seeing that a bright
future is possible.
Direct report ratings of Decisiveness are related
to assessments of independence. Decisiveness
has to do with a preference for quick and
approximate actions over slow and approximate
ones. Independence has to do with the ability to
be self-directed and self-controlled in one’s
thinking. It does not seem at all surprising that
people who rate themselves as independent
thinkers would be viewed by their direct reports
as decisive.
Another interesting relationship has to do with
peer ratings of Confronting Problem
Employees, the degree to which a manager acts
decisively and fairly when dealing with problem
employees, and the emotional intelligence
measure of assertiveness. Assertive people are
able to express their beliefs and feelings in a
nondestructive manner. These results suggest that
being able to do this is helpful when it comes to
dealing with problematic performance situations.
Change Management is the final Benchmarks
scale to be connected with emotional intelligence.
This skill has to do with the effectiveness of the
strategies used to facilitate change initiatives.
Ratings from direct reports are associated with
measures of social responsibility. In other words,
the ability to be a cooperative member of one’s
social group is associated with perceptions of
effectiveness in introducing change. Peer ratings
of change management are related to
interpersonal relationship abilities. Apparently,
the ability to establish satisfying relationships has
a connection to how well peers judge your ability
to institute change.
Conclusions: Leadership abilities vary according
to rater perspective and level of emotional
intelligence. In general, co-workers seem to
appreciate managers’ abilities to control their
impulses and anger, to withstand adverse events
and stressful situations, to be happy with life, and
to be a cooperative member of the group. These
leaders are more likely to be seen as participative,
self-aware, composed, and balanced.
Is the need to develop emotional
intelligence abilities related to
derailment behaviors?
Findings: In his 1998 book, Working With
Emotional Intelligence, Donald Goleman suggests
that some of the reasons why people derail stem
from a lack of emotional intelligence. Our
research indicates the absence of emotional
intelligence is related to career derailment. Low
emotional intelligence scores are related to:
􀂉 Problems with Interpersonal Relationships
􀂉 Difficulty Changing or Adapting
Ratings on Problems with Interpersonal
Relationships from all co-workers—bosses, peers,
and direct reports—were associated with low
scores on impulse control. Problems with
Interpersonal Relationships ratings from direct
reports and peers were related to stress tolerance.
Ratings from direct reports were related to social
responsibility.
Conclusions: These results suggest that
managers who don’t feel a responsibility to
others, can’t handle stress, are unaware of their
own emotions, lack the ability to understand
others, or erupt into anger easily are viewed as
likely to derail due to problems dealing with other
people. High scores from direct reports on
Difficulty Changing or Adapting were related to
EQ-i scores on stress tolerance, and impulse
control. Managers who resist change and
growth, as high scores on this derailment factor
imply, may be plainly visible to direct reports.
Suggestions for Development
What can you do if you want to improve your
skills in the leadership arena and perceptions of
your emotional intelligence too?
Self-Awareness is key to leadership development
and is a skill to handling stress. The more
accurately we can identify and monitor our
emotional upsets, the faster we can recover. Selfawareness
can be developed through the practice
of seeking on-going feedback. Ask supervisors
and co-workers who know you well for honest
feedback on how your behavior is impacting
them. Use opportunities to self-reflect upon
adversity – business failures, demotions, missed
promotions, unchallenging jobs, and personal
trauma. Consider what you learned as a result of
these hardships. Participate in a leadership
development program that features self-awareness
and reflection and ask for feedback on a multirater
assessment.
The ability to demonstrate yourself as a
cooperative, contributing, and
constructive member of the group, is
critical for long-term career success.
Consider managing an inexperienced
work team or employees who are
resistant. Think about what you can do
to contribute positively to group and
organizational goals through new job
assignments, existing jobs, role models or
coaches.
If maintaining self-control is a developmental
area for you, consider leading a task force or
project team made up of diverse members, taking
calls on a customer hot line, negotiating a high
profile case, or representing your organization to
the media or influential outsiders. Seek a job
assignment such as a project or task force headed
by someone known for his or her high since of
integrity and crisis management strength.
References:
Bar-On, R. (1999). BarOn Emotional Quotient
Inventory: A measure of emotional intelligence
(Technical manual). Toronto, Canada: Multi-
Health Systems.
Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional
intelligence. New York, NY:
Bantam Books.
Ruderman, M.N., Hannum, K., Leslie, J.B., &
Steed, J.L. (2001). Leadership skills and
emotional intelligence (Unpublished manuscript).
Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
The Measures
Benchmarks® is 360 degree assessment-for development tool that is based on 15 years of CCL
research: 1) a body of research looking at the characteristics successful executives develop over
time and 2) a series of studies investigating why some high–potential executives derail and fall off
the success track. Feedback is provided on 16 leadership skills and perspectives and 5 derailment
scales. The BarOn EQ-i has fifteen scales that can be divided into five larger groupings. The areas
assessed are emotional self-awareness, assertiveness, self-regard, self-actualization, independence,
empathy, interpersonal relationship, social responsibility, problem solving, reality testing,
flexibility, stress tolerance, impulse control, happiness, and optimism. The BarOn EQ-i was
selected because it had the greatest body of scientific data suggesting it was an accurate and
reliable means of assessing emotional intelligence.